ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L
ENCG.L (L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF) and VAGS.L (Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - ENCG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped, while VAGS.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENCG.L returned 10.78%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for VAGS.L. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. ENCG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VAGS.L.
Performance
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENCG.L is traded in GBp, while VAGS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAGS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENCG.L achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than VAGS.L's 0.06% return.
ENCG.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 24.44%
- 1Y
- 35.56%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VAGS.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 3.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- —
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCG.L L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF | 26.21% | 0.89% | 5.39% | -7.83% | 38.17% | 13.94% |
VAGS.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating | 0.06% | 4.96% | 2.39% | 5.94% | -13.72% | -1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENCG.L and VAGS.L is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021 | -0.26 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ENCG.L and VAGS.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.26 to -0.47, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENCG.L
VAGS.L
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
-
Communication Services
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
-
Energy
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
-
Financial Services
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
Healthcare
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
-
Industrials
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
-
Technology
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
-
Utilities
ENCG.L
-
VAGS.L
-
Real Estate
ENCG.L
VAGS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ENCG.L
VAGS.L
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENCG.L | VAGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.15 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 1.18 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 3.48 | +7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENCG.L | VAGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 0.90 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.11 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENCG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.32%, which is greater than VAGS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCG.L and VAGS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENCG.L | VAGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.32% | -17.99% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -2.67% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.11% | -3.93% | -13.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -3.83% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.09% | -6.65% | -6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 0.91% | +2.18% |
Volatility
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) at 1.43%. This indicates that ENCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAGS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENCG.L | VAGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.35% | 1.43% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | 2.77% | +11.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 3.52% | +14.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 4.86% | +13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 4.58% | +13.53% |
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENCG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VAGS.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENCG.L nor VAGS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENCG.L and VAGS.L have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VAGS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VAGS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENCG.L.
ENCG.L is categorized as Commodities, while VAGS.L is Global Bonds. ENCG.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped, while VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ENCG.L and 0.10% for VAGS.L.
Find the right allocation for ENCG.L and VAGS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer