PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENCG.L is traded in GBp, while VAGS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAGS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENCG.L achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than VAGS.L's 0.06% return.


ENCG.L

1D
0.77%
1M
0.86%
YTD
26.21%
6M
24.44%
1Y
35.56%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
10Y*

VAGS.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.06%
6M
0.16%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ENCG.L
L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF
26.21%0.89%5.39%-7.83%38.17%13.94%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.06%4.96%2.39%5.94%-13.72%-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ENCG.L and VAGS.L is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021

-0.26

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ENCG.L and VAGS.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.26 to -0.47, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ENCG.L
VAGS.L

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

-3.5%

-

Basic Materials

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Communication Services

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Energy

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Financial Services

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L
100.0%

Healthcare

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Industrials

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Technology

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Utilities

ENCG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Real Estate

ENCG.L
-3.5%
VAGS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENCG.L
ENCG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ENCG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENCG.LVAGS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.15

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

1.18

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.46

3.48

+7.99

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENCG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENCG.L and VAGS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENCG.LVAGS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

0.90

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.11

+0.70

Drawdowns

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENCG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.32%, which is greater than VAGS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCG.L and VAGS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENCG.LVAGS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.32%

-17.99%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-2.67%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-3.93%

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-3.83%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.09%

-6.65%

-6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

0.91%

+2.18%

Volatility

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) at 1.43%. This indicates that ENCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAGS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENCG.LVAGS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

1.43%

+4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

2.77%

+11.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

3.52%

+14.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

4.86%

+13.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

4.58%

+13.53%

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENCG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VAGS.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENCG.L vs. VAGS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENCG.L nor VAGS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ENCG.L and VAGS.L have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENCG.L.

ENCG.L is categorized as Commodities, while VAGS.L is Global Bonds. ENCG.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped, while VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ENCG.L and 0.10% for VAGS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENCG.L and VAGS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer