PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ENB.TO (Enbridge Inc.) is a stock, while CGL.TO (iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged)) is Gold fund tracking the Gold Bullion. Over the past 10 years, ENB.TO returned 10.59%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for CGL.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENB.TO achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly higher than CGL.TO's -3.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ENB.TO having a 10.59% annualized return and CGL.TO not far ahead at 10.99%.

ENB.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
3.74%
YTD
23.42%
6M
23.83%
1Y
31.58%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
17.63%
10Y*
10.59%

CGL.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
-9.62%
YTD
-3.19%
6M
-3.25%
1Y
19.93%
3Y*
27.16%
5Y*
15.73%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENB.TO
Enbridge Inc.		23.42%14.09%37.18%-3.28%13.96%29.98%-15.30%29.43%-8.30%-8.84%
CGL.TO
iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged)		-3.19%60.08%25.70%11.26%-1.07%-4.58%23.41%16.58%-3.19%11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ENB.TO and CGL.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2010

0.01

The correlation between ENB.TO and CGL.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Enbridge Inc.

iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with ENB.TO:
ENB.TO vs. CNQ.TOENB.TO vs. PPL.TOENB.TO vs. SU.TOENB.TO vs. WCP.TOENB.TO vs. TRP.TOENB.TO vs. TD.TOENB.TO vs. BCE.TO
Often compared with CGL.TO:
CGL.TO vs. CGL-C.TOCGL.TO vs. XGD.TOCGL.TO vs. KILO.TOCGL.TO vs. MNT.TOCGL.TO vs. GLDMCGL.TO vs. VOOCGL.TO vs. SVR.TO

Return for Risk

ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ENB.TO
ENB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ENB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ENB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
CGL.TO
CGL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CGL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CGL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ENB.TOCGL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.00
0.78

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.83
1.15

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.16

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

0.87

+2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

2.49

+6.12

ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the CGL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENB.TO and CGL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, smaller than the maximum CGL.TO drawdown of -45.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENB.TO and CGL.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ENB.TOCGL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.47%

-45.96%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-24.93%

+15.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.56%

-24.93%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-24.93%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.47%

-24.93%

-14.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-22.50%

+20.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-20.30%

+11.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

8.66%

-5.00%

Volatility

ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) is 5.97%, while iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that ENB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ENB.TOCGL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

7.67%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

24.08%

-11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

27.61%

-11.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

18.54%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

16.53%

+5.90%

Dividends

ENB.TO vs. CGL.TO - Dividend Comparison

ENB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, while CGL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGL.TO
iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ENB.TO
Enbridge Inc.		4.84%5.74%6.00%7.44%6.50%6.76%7.96%5.72%6.33%4.91%3.75%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

ENB.TO and CGL.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENB.TO and CGL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer