PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENA.DE vs. CHFFY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENA.DE vs. CHFFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Endesa S.A. (ENA.DE) and China Everbright International Ltd ADR (CHFFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENA.DE is traded in EUR, while CHFFY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHFFY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENA.DE achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly higher than CHFFY's -1.15% return.


ENA.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
20.47%
6M
20.08%
1Y
40.93%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
10Y*

CHFFY

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.11%
YTD
-1.15%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
62.69%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
-0.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENA.DE vs. CHFFY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ENA.DE
Endesa S.A.
20.47%59.64%12.63%17.18%-8.69%2.39%
CHFFY
China Everbright International Ltd ADR
-1.15%49.17%61.24%-25.18%-35.00%0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ENA.DE and CHFFY is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2021

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENA.DE vs. CHFFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENA.DE
ENA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ENA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ENA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CHFFY
CHFFY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHFFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHFFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHFFY Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CHFFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHFFY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENA.DE vs. CHFFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Endesa S.A. (ENA.DE) and China Everbright International Ltd ADR (CHFFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENA.DECHFFYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.50

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.35

4.17

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

12.03

+2.19

ENA.DE vs. CHFFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the CHFFY Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENA.DE and CHFFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENA.DECHFFYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.40

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

-0.05

+1.19

Drawdowns

ENA.DE vs. CHFFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENA.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.96%, smaller than the maximum CHFFY drawdown of -74.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENA.DE and CHFFY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENA.DECHFFYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.96%

-74.98%

+46.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.79%

-15.26%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.36%

-25.47%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.72%

-39.54%

+33.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-47.64%

+42.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

5.26%

-1.82%

Volatility

ENA.DE vs. CHFFY - Volatility Comparison

Endesa S.A. (ENA.DE) and China Everbright International Ltd ADR (CHFFY) have volatilities of 3.07% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENA.DECHFFYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

2.93%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.11%

19.18%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.03%

45.54%

-23.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.12%

40.59%

-9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.12%

54.33%

-23.21%

Dividends

ENA.DE vs. CHFFY - Dividend Comparison

ENA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than CHFFY's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CHFFY
China Everbright International Ltd ADR
5.35%4.55%6.62%9.70%9.03%6.09%3.23%0.00%0.00%3.25%2.92%
ENA.DE
Endesa S.A.
3.62%4.29%2.46%11.25%5.35%2.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ENA.DE vs. CHFFY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Endesa S.A. and China Everbright International Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ENA.DE values in EUR, CHFFY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ENA.DE and CHFFY have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENA.DE and CHFFY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer