EMXC vs. TECB
EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and TECB (iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while TECB is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 11.46%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for TECB. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TECB.
Performance
EMXC vs. TECB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 32.33% return, which is significantly higher than TECB's 14.97% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 32.33%
- 6M
- 36.39%
- 1Y
- 62.72%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- —
TECB
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 27.32%
- 3Y*
- 24.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC vs. TECB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 32.33% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 11.81% |
TECB iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF | 14.97% | 14.86% | 24.38% | 57.53% | -34.39% | 19.60% | 39.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and TECB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between EMXC and TECB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMXC vs. TECB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXC
TECB
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
EMXC
TECB
Financial Services
EMXC
TECB
Industrials
EMXC
TECB
Basic Materials
EMXC
TECB
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMXC
TECB
Energy
EMXC
TECB
Communication Services
EMXC
TECB
Consumer Defensive
EMXC
TECB
-
Utilities
EMXC
TECB
-
Healthcare
EMXC
TECB
Real Estate
EMXC
TECB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. TECB — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
TECB
EMXC vs. TECB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC | TECB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.27 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 1.69 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | 4.93 | +12.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC | TECB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 1.56 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.57 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.70 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. TECB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, roughly equal to the maximum TECB drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and TECB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | TECB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -41.62% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -16.24% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -23.91% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | -41.62% | +12.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -5.64% | -1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -10.17% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 5.55% | -1.91% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. TECB - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) at 7.20%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TECB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | TECB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 7.20% | +5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.20% | 14.03% | +7.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.27% | 17.68% | +5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 23.59% | -5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 25.42% | -5.43% |
EMXC vs. TECB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TECB's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXC vs. TECB - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than TECB's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.13% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
TECB iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.23% | 0.61% | 0.35% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC and TECB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to TECB (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs TECB's -41.62%.
On 5-year performance, TECB leads with 13.47% vs 11.46% for EMXC. On fees, TECB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TECB has been the lower-risk option at 7.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TECB has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TECB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.29% for TECB.
EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TECB is Technology Equities. EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while TECB tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.40% for TECB.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXC and TECB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer