PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC vs. STXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXC vs. STXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 28.12% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 31.89% return.


EMXC

1D
0.49%
1M
-4.55%
6M
15.83%
YTD
28.12%
1Y
51.73%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.40%

STXE

1D
0.31%
1M
-4.78%
6M
17.76%
YTD
31.89%
1Y
56.83%
3Y*
24.25%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$255.60M$267.52M$279.80M
$408.52K$564.14K$567.10K

EMXC vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
28.12%35.14%2.68%10.99%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
31.89%34.23%2.09%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and STXE is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023

0.94

The correlation between EMXC and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXC vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMXC
STXE

Technology

53.4%
40.3%

Financial Services

18.0%
15.7%

Industrials

6.5%
5.0%

Basic Materials

5.5%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
1.4%

Energy

3.1%
3.5%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
1.7%

Healthcare

1.8%
0.6%

Utilities

1.8%
1.1%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.4%

Technology

EMXC
53.4%
STXE
40.3%

Financial Services

EMXC
18.0%
STXE
15.7%

Industrials

EMXC
6.5%
STXE
5.0%

Basic Materials

EMXC
5.5%
STXE
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EMXC
3.8%
STXE
1.4%

Energy

EMXC
3.1%
STXE
3.5%

Communication Services

EMXC
2.9%
STXE
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

EMXC
2.4%
STXE
1.7%

Healthcare

EMXC
1.8%
STXE
0.6%

Utilities

EMXC
1.8%
STXE
1.1%

Real Estate

EMXC
0.8%
STXE
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXC vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMXC vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMXCSTXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.80

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.91

10.42

-0.51

EMXC vs. STXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the STXE Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and STXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and STXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXCSTXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-20.38%

-22.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-20.38%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

-20.38%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.07%

-14.32%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-3.96%

-6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

5.47%

-0.24%

Volatility

EMXC vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) is 10.77%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 12.86%. This indicates that EMXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXCSTXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.77%

12.86%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.82%

28.03%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.64%

29.88%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

20.16%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

20.16%

+0.34%

EMXC vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMXC vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than STXE's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.08%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.90%2.66%3.22%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EMXC and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STXE has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to EMXC (10.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs STXE's -20.38%.

On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 24.25% vs 23.89% for EMXC. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EMXC has been the lower-risk option at 10.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 23.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.90% for STXE.

EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.32% for STXE.

STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC and STXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer