EMXC vs. STXE
EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while STXE is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMXC returned 29.08%/yr vs 29.77%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
EMXC vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 41.72% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 47.29% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 12.61%
- YTD
- 41.72%
- 6M
- 46.94%
- 1Y
- 77.94%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
STXE
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 15.10%
- YTD
- 47.29%
- 6M
- 52.92%
- 1Y
- 84.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 41.72% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 11.01% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 47.29% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and STXE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EMXC and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMXC vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXC
STXE
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
EMXC
STXE
Financial Services
EMXC
STXE
Industrials
EMXC
STXE
Basic Materials
EMXC
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
EMXC
STXE
Energy
EMXC
STXE
Communication Services
EMXC
STXE
Consumer Defensive
EMXC
STXE
Utilities
EMXC
STXE
Healthcare
EMXC
STXE
Real Estate
EMXC
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
STXE
EMXC vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.65 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | 5.85 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.99 | 23.95 | -1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61 | 3.70 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.57 | -1.02 |
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -18.92% | -23.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -14.51% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -18.92% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -1.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -3.72% | -6.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.54% | +0.02% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) is 9.88%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that EMXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 10.53% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 20.81% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 22.95% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 17.68% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 17.68% | +2.14% |
EMXC vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXC vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than STXE's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 1.99% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.83% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EMXC and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STXE has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to EMXC (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs STXE's -18.92%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 29.77% vs 29.08% for EMXC. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EMXC has been the lower-risk option at 9.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 29.77% return vs 29.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.83% for STXE.
EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while STXE is Emerging Markets Diversified. EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.32% for STXE.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 3.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXC and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer