EMXC vs. LX
EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while LX (LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 11.46%/yr vs -25.63%/yr for LX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMXC vs. LX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 32.33% return, which is significantly higher than LX's -31.09% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 32.33%
- 6M
- 36.39%
- 1Y
- 62.72%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- —
LX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- -31.09%
- 6M
- -31.51%
- 1Y
- -68.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- -25.63%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC vs. LX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 32.33% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 2.61% |
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | -31.09% | -40.97% | 242.61% | 6.40% | -50.78% | -42.39% | -51.76% | 91.59% | -47.84% | 1,199.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and LX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2017 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. LX — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
LX
EMXC vs. LX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC | LX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 0.76 | +0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | -0.95 | +5.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | -1.38 | +18.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC | LX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | -1.07 | +3.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | -0.35 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.04 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. LX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum LX drawdown of -93.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and LX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | LX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -93.19% | +50.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -72.18% | +57.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -81.04% | +61.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | -90.23% | +61.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -85.24% | +77.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -63.32% | +53.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 49.57% | -45.93% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. LX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) is 12.57%, while LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) has a volatility of 22.74%. This indicates that EMXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | LX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 22.74% | -10.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.20% | 36.53% | -15.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.27% | 63.97% | -40.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 73.71% | -55.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 323.46% | -303.47% |
Dividends
EMXC vs. LX - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than LX's 18.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.13% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | 18.45% | 9.30% | 2.38% | 11.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC and LX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LX has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to EMXC (12.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs LX's -93.19%.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXC and LX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer