EMXC vs. KEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 12.76%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for KEMX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

EMXC vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMXC having a 41.72% return and KEMX slightly higher at 42.26%.

EMXC

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 12.61%
• YTD: 41.72%
• 6M: 46.94%
• 1Y: 77.94%
• 3Y*: 29.08%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: —

KEMX

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 13.02%
• YTD: 42.26%
• 6M: 47.92%
• 1Y: 79.97%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	41.72%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	5.80%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	42.26%	38.28%	0.36%	20.57%	-19.35%	10.55%	12.84%	7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and KEMX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019	0.95

The correlation between EMXC and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXC vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMXC	KEMX
Technology	45.0%	41.2%
Financial Services	19.6%	20.7%
Industrials	8.3%	8.6%
Basic Materials	6.8%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	5.4%
Energy	4.2%	4.8%
Communication Services	3.4%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	3.0%
Utilities	2.3%	2.0%
Healthcare	2.2%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.2%

Return for Risk

EMXC vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 91
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 91

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMXC	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	3.59	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.39	4.31	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.62	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	5.24	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.99	20.86	+1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMXC vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is comparable to the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMXC	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	3.59	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.75	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.68	-0.13

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMXC	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-38.80%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-15.36%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.12%	-19.62%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-30.85%	+1.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-1.31%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.19%	-8.86%	-1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	3.85%	-0.29%

Volatility

EMXC vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) have volatilities of 9.88% and 9.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMXC	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.88%	9.86%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.34%	19.90%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.70%	22.40%	-0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	18.21%	-0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.82%	20.94%	-1.12%

EMXC vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMXC vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than KEMX's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	1.99%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.31%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMXC and KEMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, EMXC and KEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMXC or KEMX?

EMXC has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to KEMX (9.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

Which ETF is better, EMXC or KEMX?

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 12.76% for EMXC. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMXC or KEMX?

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMXC or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMXC or KEMX?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.99% for EMXC.

What is the main difference between EMXC and KEMX?

EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while KEMX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Both ETFs track MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.25% for KEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 3.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.