EMXC vs. GLLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and GLLSX (abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while GLLSX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Aberdeen. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 12.76%/yr vs 18.30%/yr for GLLSX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for GLLSX.

Performance

EMXC vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 41.72% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 46.58% return.

EMXC

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 12.61%
• YTD: 41.72%
• 6M: 46.94%
• 1Y: 77.94%
• 3Y*: 29.08%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: —

GLLSX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 11.34%
• YTD: 46.58%
• 6M: 50.65%
• 1Y: 88.61%
• 3Y*: 29.36%
• 5Y*: 18.30%
• 10Y*: 15.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	41.72%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-12.96%	7.01%
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	46.58%	34.81%	0.73%	21.35%	-23.04%	36.50%	15.93%	23.64%	-11.50%	5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and GLLSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017	0.83

The correlation between EMXC and GLLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMXC vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 91
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 91

GLLSX

GLLSX Risk / Return Rank: 96
GLLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GLLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GLLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMXC	GLLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	4.14	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.39	4.78	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.74	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	6.17	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.99	24.54	-2.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMXC vs. GLLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is comparable to the GLLSX Sharpe Ratio of 4.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and GLLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMXC	GLLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	4.14	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	1.02	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.69	-0.14

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and GLLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMXC	GLLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-32.59%	-10.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-14.39%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.12%	-20.95%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-30.02%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	0.00%	-1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.19%	-7.92%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	3.61%	-0.05%

Volatility

EMXC vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) have volatilities of 9.88% and 9.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMXC	GLLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.88%	9.95%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.34%	19.05%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.70%	21.43%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	18.09%	-0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.82%	17.80%	+2.02%

EMXC vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMXC vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than GLLSX's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	1.99%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	1.28%	1.88%	0.74%	0.77%	29.32%	22.85%	0.00%	3.38%	9.47%	8.40%	1.09%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMXC and GLLSX in my portfolio?

EMXC and GLLSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMXC or GLLSX?

GLLSX has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to EMXC (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs GLLSX's -32.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.14 vs 3.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.