PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EMXC vs. GEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and GEQT.TO (iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while GEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. EMXC is passively managed, while GEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 12.14%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for GEQT.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GEQT.TO.

Performance

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMXC is traded in USD, while GEQT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GEQT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 37.25% return, which is significantly higher than GEQT.TO's 12.02% return.

EMXC

1D
0.55%
1M
2.60%
YTD
37.25%
6M
42.23%
1Y
67.80%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
—

GEQT.TO

1D
0.54%
1M
1.40%
YTD
12.02%
6M
10.91%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF		37.25%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%22.73%
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		12.02%23.49%15.63%25.34%-20.25%22.05%9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and GEQT.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020

0.47

The correlation between EMXC and GEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EMXC
GEQT.TO

Technology

52.4%
34.2%

Financial Services

17.4%
29.0%

Industrials

6.9%
8.6%

Basic Materials

6.0%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
5.0%

Energy

3.4%
0.1%

Communication Services

3.0%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
2.7%

Utilities

1.9%
1.0%

Healthcare

1.8%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.9%

Technology

EMXC
52.4%
GEQT.TO
34.2%

Financial Services

EMXC
17.4%
GEQT.TO
29.0%

Industrials

EMXC
6.9%
GEQT.TO
8.6%

Basic Materials

EMXC
6.0%
GEQT.TO
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EMXC
4.1%
GEQT.TO
5.0%

Energy

EMXC
3.4%
GEQT.TO
0.1%

Communication Services

EMXC
3.0%
GEQT.TO
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

EMXC
2.4%
GEQT.TO
2.7%

Utilities

EMXC
1.9%
GEQT.TO
1.0%

Healthcare

EMXC
1.8%
GEQT.TO
4.9%

Real Estate

EMXC
0.8%
GEQT.TO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with EMXC:
EMXC vs. XCEMEMXC vs. IEMGEMXC vs. VWOEMXC vs. EEMEMXC vs. SPEMEMXC vs. VEXCEMXC vs. VNM
Often compared with GEQT.TO:
GEQT.TO vs. XEQT.TOGEQT.TO vs. GGRO.TOGEQT.TO vs. ZAG.TOGEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. XEN.TOGEQT.TO vs. XBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. VT

Return for Risk

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO
GEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EMXCGEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.74
1.69

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.35
2.34

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.31

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

2.42

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.51

10.35

+7.17

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and GEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than GEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and GEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EMXCGEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-30.45%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

-10.59%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

-18.97%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

-30.45%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-1.70%

-2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-6.88%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

2.47%

+1.27%

Volatility

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) at 5.82%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EMXCGEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.83%

5.82%

+7.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.90%

12.72%

+9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.90%

15.19%

+8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

18.89%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.07%

18.64%

+1.43%

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GEQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMXC vs. GEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than GEQT.TO's 1.11% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF		2.05%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		1.11%1.26%1.38%1.58%1.82%1.32%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EMXC and GEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GEQT.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.25% for GEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC and GEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer