EMXC vs. FLDR
EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while FLDR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 11.46%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for FLDR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.
Performance
EMXC vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 32.33% return, which is significantly higher than FLDR's 1.37% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 32.33%
- 6M
- 36.39%
- 1Y
- 62.72%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- —
FLDR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 32.33% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -6.80% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.37% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | -0.33% | -0.18% | 2.01% | 4.52% | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and FLDR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018 | 0.07 |
The correlation between EMXC and FLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
FLDR
EMXC vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 2.70 | -1.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 10.04 | -5.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | 68.61 | -51.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 5.83 | -3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 3.05 | -2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and FLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -12.23% | -30.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -0.47% | -13.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -0.76% | -18.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | -2.33% | -26.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -0.08% | -7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -0.35% | -9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 0.07% | +3.57% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.19%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 0.19% | +12.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.20% | 0.59% | +20.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.27% | 0.81% | +22.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 1.21% | +16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 5.26% | +14.73% |
EMXC vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXC vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than FLDR's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.13% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.43% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC and FLDR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs FLDR's -12.23%.
On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 11.46% vs 3.67% for FLDR. On fees, FLDR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 11.46% return vs 3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLDR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 2.13% for EMXC.
EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FLDR is Corporate Bonds. EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.15% for FLDR.
FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXC and FLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer