PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC vs. EVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXC vs. EVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 37.89% return, which is significantly higher than EVLU's 28.98% return.


EMXC

1D
-6.44%
1M
4.83%
YTD
37.89%
6M
39.80%
1Y
67.97%
3Y*
27.65%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*

EVLU

1D
-3.07%
1M
3.10%
YTD
28.98%
6M
30.29%
1Y
59.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. EVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
37.89%35.14%-5.36%
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
28.98%38.54%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and EVLU is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.84

The correlation between EMXC and EVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXC vs. EVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLU
EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. EVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMXCEVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.53

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

4.64

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.14

16.27

+1.86

EMXC vs. EVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the EVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and EVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. EVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than EVLU's maximum drawdown of -17.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and EVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXCEVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-17.17%

-25.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

-12.90%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-5.94%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-3.52%

-6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

3.67%

+0.09%

Volatility

EMXC vs. EVLU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) at 9.29%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXCEVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

9.29%

+5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.44%

17.64%

+5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.27%

20.18%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

20.36%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.25%

20.36%

-0.11%

EMXC vs. EVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EVLU's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMXC vs. EVLU - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than EVLU's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
1.93%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
3.77%5.20%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMXC and EVLU have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to EVLU (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs EVLU's -17.17%.

On 1-year performance, EMXC leads with 67.97% vs 59.59% for EVLU. On fees, EVLU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EVLU has been the lower-risk option at 9.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 67.97% return vs 59.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVLU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

EVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 1.93% for EMXC.

EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.35% for EVLU.

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC and EVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer