EMXC vs. EMCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and EMCR (Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index while EMCR tracks the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 12.76%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for EMCR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCR.

Performance

EMXC vs. EMCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 41.72% return, which is significantly higher than EMCR's 23.20% return.

EMXC

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 12.61%
• YTD: 41.72%
• 6M: 46.94%
• 1Y: 77.94%
• 3Y*: 29.08%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: —

EMCR

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 8.67%
• YTD: 23.20%
• 6M: 25.84%
• 1Y: 50.54%
• 3Y*: 23.64%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. EMCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	41.72%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-0.13%
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF	23.20%	33.25%	9.69%	10.55%	-18.73%	5.54%	13.49%	22.41%	-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and EMCR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018	0.85

The correlation between EMXC and EMCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXC vs. EMCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMXC	EMCR
Technology	45.0%	36.2%
Financial Services	19.6%	20.7%
Industrials	8.3%	6.7%
Basic Materials	6.8%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	10.6%
Energy	4.2%	0.1%
Communication Services	3.4%	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	2.8%
Utilities	2.3%	1.5%
Healthcare	2.2%	5.6%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.8%

Return for Risk

EMXC vs. EMCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 91
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 91

EMCR

EMCR Risk / Return Rank: 76
EMCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EMCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EMCR Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EMCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EMCR Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. EMCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMXC	EMCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	2.59	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.39	3.36	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.47	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	3.67	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.99	14.03	+7.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMXC vs. EMCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the EMCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and EMCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMXC	EMCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	2.59	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.47	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.60	-0.06

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. EMCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than EMCR's maximum drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and EMCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMXC	EMCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-34.28%	-8.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-13.84%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.12%	-18.38%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-34.28%	+5.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-1.34%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.19%	-9.33%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	3.61%	-0.05%

Volatility

EMXC vs. EMCR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) at 8.10%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMXC	EMCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.88%	8.10%	+1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.34%	16.90%	+2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.70%	19.60%	+2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	19.29%	-1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.82%	19.86%	-0.04%

EMXC vs. EMCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCR's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMXC vs. EMCR - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than EMCR's 1.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF	1.97%	2.43%	6.62%	1.95%	3.05%	1.83%	1.75%	3.15%	0.19%	0.00%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	1.99%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMXC and EMCR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, EMXC and EMCR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMXC or EMCR?

EMXC has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to EMCR (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs EMCR's -34.28%.

Which ETF is better, EMXC or EMCR?

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.76% vs 9.02% for EMCR. On fees, EMCR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMCR has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMXC or EMCR?

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMXC or EMCR?

EMCR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMXC or EMCR?

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.97% for EMCR.

What is the main difference between EMXC and EMCR?

EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.15% for EMCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.