PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC vs. CAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXC vs. CAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 42.50% return, which is significantly lower than CAT's 63.72% return.


EMXC

1D
3.83%
1M
10.65%
YTD
42.50%
6M
47.59%
1Y
74.22%
3Y*
27.88%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*

CAT

1D
2.57%
1M
5.14%
YTD
63.72%
6M
59.03%
1Y
164.40%
3Y*
58.53%
5Y*
36.30%
10Y*
31.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. CAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
42.50%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.16%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
63.72%60.30%24.66%25.95%18.60%15.95%26.97%19.51%-17.56%38.40%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and CAT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.52

The correlation between EMXC and CAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXC vs. CAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CAT
CAT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMXCCATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.67

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.18

11.92

-6.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.92

39.03

-19.11

EMXC vs. CAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is lower than the CAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and CAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum CAT drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and CAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXCCATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-73.43%

+30.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

-13.88%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

-34.05%

+14.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

-34.05%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.70%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-19.73%

+9.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

4.23%

-0.49%

Volatility

EMXC vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) have volatilities of 13.30% and 13.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXCCATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.30%

13.25%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.16%

28.43%

-6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.16%

35.28%

-11.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

30.82%

-12.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.10%

31.00%

-10.90%

Dividends

EMXC vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than CAT's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
0.65%1.02%1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.56%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMXC and CAT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (13.30%) compared to CAT (13.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs CAT's -73.43%.

CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC and CAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer