EMXC vs. BCSVX

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and BCSVX (Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund) are both funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while BCSVX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Brown Capital Management. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 11.14%/yr vs -3.78%/yr for BCSVX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for BCSVX.

Performance

EMXC vs. BCSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 26.88% return, which is significantly higher than BCSVX's -11.15% return.

EMXC

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -13.31%
• 6M: 19.25%
• YTD: 26.88%
• 1Y: 47.52%
• 3Y*: 22.87%
• 5Y*: 11.14%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.32%

BCSVX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 4.52%
• 6M: -9.86%
• YTD: -11.15%
• 1Y: -23.24%
• 3Y*: -1.35%
• 5Y*: -3.78%
• 10Y*: 7.25%
• ALL TIME*: 7.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. BCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	26.88%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-12.96%	7.16%
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	-11.15%	-2.30%	8.17%	20.04%	-31.56%	12.69%	44.75%	26.41%	-3.39%	12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and BCSVX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017	0.55

The correlation between EMXC and BCSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMXC vs. BCSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 76
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 78

BCSVX

BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 0
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. BCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMXC	BCSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	-1.35	+3.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	-1.91	+4.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.79	+0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	-0.72	+4.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.67	-1.23	+11.89

EMXC vs. BCSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the BCSVX Sharpe Ratio of -1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and BCSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. BCSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, roughly equal to the maximum BCSVX drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and BCSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMXC	BCSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-43.93%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-32.35%	+17.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.12%	-32.35%	+13.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-43.93%	+15.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.92%	-25.98%	+12.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-12.29%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.47%	19.05%	-14.58%

Volatility

EMXC vs. BCSVX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 11.80% compared to Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) at 5.17%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMXC	BCSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.80%	5.17%	+6.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.94%	14.72%	+10.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.64%	17.28%	+9.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.75%	18.80%	-0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.38%	17.04%	+3.34%

EMXC vs. BCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BCSVX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMXC vs. BCSVX - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than BCSVX's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.07%	0.74%	0.30%	0.31%	0.00%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.10%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMXC and BCSVX in my portfolio?

EMXC and BCSVX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMXC or BCSVX?

EMXC has higher volatility (11.80%) compared to BCSVX (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs BCSVX's -43.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.