EMXC.DE vs. SADM.DE
EMXC.DE (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc) and SADM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Amundi - EMXC.DE tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while SADM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC.DE returned 14.13%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for SADM.DE. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXC.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SADM.DE.
Performance
EMXC.DE vs. SADM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC.DE achieves a 44.88% return, which is significantly higher than SADM.DE's 13.40% return.
EMXC.DE
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 44.88%
- 6M
- 47.41%
- 1Y
- 69.83%
- 3Y*
- 26.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SADM.DE
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC.DE vs. SADM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC.DE Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc | 44.88% | 19.92% | 9.13% | 14.31% | -13.59% | 17.56% | 22.22% |
SADM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF | 13.40% | 18.73% | 12.63% | 0.17% | -15.44% | 6.79% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC.DE and SADM.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EMXC.DE and SADM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC.DE vs. SADM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC.DE
SADM.DE
EMXC.DE vs. SADM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMXC.DE | SADM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.27 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.85 | 2.91 | +2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.06 | 8.88 | +12.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMXC.DE vs. SADM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, which is greater than SADM.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.DE and SADM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC.DE | SADM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -27.29% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -9.42% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | -17.93% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.47% | -26.42% | +5.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.04% | -5.03% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -11.55% | +3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.10% | +0.20% |
Volatility
EMXC.DE vs. SADM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE) at 8.34%. This indicates that EMXC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SADM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC.DE | SADM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.10% | 8.34% | +1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.32% | 15.27% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.53% | 18.14% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 17.19% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 17.69% | +1.34% |
EMXC.DE vs. SADM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SADM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMXC.DE vs. SADM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMXC.DE nor SADM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC.DE and SADM.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SADM.DE.
EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while SADM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMXC.DE and 0.18% for SADM.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMXC.DE and SADM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer