PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC.DE achieves a 30.36% return, which is significantly higher than NQSE.DE's 10.53% return.


EMXC.DE

1D
-1.60%
1M
-12.60%
6M
21.10%
YTD
30.36%
1Y
49.32%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*

NQSE.DE

1D
-2.24%
1M
-5.74%
6M
10.53%
YTD
10.53%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
30.36%19.92%9.13%14.31%-13.59%17.56%2.25%-4.50%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
10.53%18.19%24.02%52.15%-36.27%27.38%45.18%13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2019

0.62

The correlation between EMXC.DE and NQSE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMXC.DENQSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.21

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.78

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.15

5.78

+6.36

EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC.DE and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, which is greater than NQSE.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.DE and NQSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXC.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.89%

-37.62%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.66%

-11.88%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.47%

-22.41%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.47%

-37.62%

+17.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.66%

-6.95%

-6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-8.49%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

3.67%

+0.28%

Volatility

EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) at 6.20%. This indicates that EMXC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXC.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

6.20%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.82%

13.90%

+6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.00%

17.71%

+5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

21.19%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

21.60%

-2.40%

EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMXC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMXC.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMXC.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

EMXC.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMXC.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC.DE and NQSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer