EMXC.DE vs. EUNZ.DE
EMXC.DE (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc) and EUNZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMXC.DE tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while EUNZ.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC.DE returned 13.66%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for EUNZ.DE. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXC.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EUNZ.DE.
Performance
EMXC.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC.DE achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than EUNZ.DE's 18.69% return.
EMXC.DE
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 8.39%
- YTD
- 40.23%
- 6M
- 44.14%
- 1Y
- 69.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNZ.DE
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 22.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
EMXC.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC.DE Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc | 40.23% | 19.92% | 9.13% | 14.33% | -13.60% | 17.56% | 2.27% | 6.14% |
EUNZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 18.69% | -0.15% | 15.73% | 3.85% | -8.85% | 13.05% | -2.49% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC.DE and EUNZ.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EMXC.DE and EUNZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC.DE vs. EUNZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC.DE
EUNZ.DE
EMXC.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.35 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.78 | 3.00 | +2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.97 | 10.57 | +11.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 1.85 | +1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.56 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.35 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
EMXC.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than EUNZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.DE and EUNZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -30.47% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -7.50% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.48% | -14.00% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | -14.00% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -1.96% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -7.62% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.13% | +1.00% |
Volatility
EMXC.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) at 4.75%. This indicates that EMXC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.44% | 4.75% | +3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | 10.35% | +6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 12.18% | +7.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 11.41% | +4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 13.32% | +5.18% |
EMXC.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXC.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMXC.DE nor EUNZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC.DE and EUNZ.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.
EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while EUNZ.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMXC.DE and 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMXC.DE and EUNZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer