PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC.DE achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than AE5A.DE's 27.41% return.


EMXC.DE

1D
-1.80%
1M
8.39%
YTD
40.23%
6M
44.14%
1Y
69.02%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*

AE5A.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
6.05%
YTD
27.41%
6M
29.44%
1Y
49.88%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
40.23%19.92%9.13%14.33%-13.60%17.56%2.27%6.14%
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
27.41%19.26%14.36%5.58%-14.19%4.19%7.49%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC.DE and AE5A.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019

0.86

The correlation between EMXC.DE and AE5A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AE5A.DE
AE5A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMXC.DEAE5A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.50

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.78

4.80

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.97

17.35

+4.62

EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is comparable to the AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC.DE and AE5A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMXC.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46

2.79

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.51

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.42

+0.27

Drawdowns

EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than AE5A.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.DE and AE5A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXC.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-36.16%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-10.34%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.48%

-19.22%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.48%

-23.47%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-2.56%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-9.72%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.87%

+0.26%

Volatility

EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) at 7.32%. This indicates that EMXC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AE5A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXC.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

7.32%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.23%

14.97%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.85%

17.82%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

17.23%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

19.05%

-0.55%

EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than AE5A.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMXC.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Dividend Comparison

EMXC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AE5A.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
1.69%2.15%3.38%3.80%2.44%1.62%1.71%2.01%2.17%
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EMXC.DE and AE5A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AE5A.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AE5A.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EMXC.DE.

EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while AE5A.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMXC.DE and 0.14% for AE5A.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC.DE and AE5A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer