EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L
EMVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EMVL.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMVL.L returned 16.16%/yr vs 11.87%/yr for SWDA.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMVL.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMVL.L is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMVL.L achieves a 43.83% return, which is significantly higher than SWDA.L's 9.81% return.
EMVL.L
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 43.83%
- 6M
- 48.06%
- 1Y
- 85.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.66%
- 5Y*
- 16.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 26.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMVL.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) | 43.83% | 43.13% | 14.48% | 18.38% | -16.29% | 5.29% | 7.16% | 17.77% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.81% | 21.14% | 19.09% | 23.79% | -18.13% | 22.52% | 15.68% | 28.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMVL.L and SWDA.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EMVL.L and SWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Financial Services
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Basic Materials
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Energy
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Industrials
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Communication Services
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Real Estate
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Healthcare
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Utilities
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMVL.L
SWDA.L
EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMVL.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.41 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.25 | 3.02 | +4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.10 | 13.29 | +11.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMVL.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07 | 2.27 | +1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.78 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.73 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMVL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMVL.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMVL.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -33.62% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -8.59% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | -17.07% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.57% | -26.50% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.20% | -0.42% | -3.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -4.58% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 1.95% | +1.44% |
Volatility
EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.81%. This indicates that EMVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMVL.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 2.81% | +6.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.52% | 8.58% | +8.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.79% | 11.41% | +9.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 15.30% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 15.73% | +6.51% |
EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMVL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMVL.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMVL.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMVL.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EMVL.L.
EMVL.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. EMVL.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EMVL.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for EMVL.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer