PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMVL.L is traded in USD, while JRDM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMVL.L achieves a 43.83% return, which is significantly higher than JRDM.L's 28.82% return.


EMVL.L

1D
-2.57%
1M
10.78%
YTD
43.83%
6M
48.06%
1Y
85.89%
3Y*
37.66%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*

JRDM.L

1D
-1.48%
1M
5.78%
YTD
28.82%
6M
32.34%
1Y
58.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMVL.L and JRDM.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023

0.54

Over the past year, EMVL.L and JRDM.L have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMVL.L
JRDM.L

Technology

44.7%
37.5%

Financial Services

13.8%
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
10.7%

Basic Materials

10.0%
5.9%

Energy

8.1%
4.5%

Industrials

2.7%
6.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
7.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.4%

Healthcare

1.7%
2.7%

Utilities

1.4%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
2.5%

Technology

EMVL.L
44.7%
JRDM.L
37.5%

Financial Services

EMVL.L
13.8%
JRDM.L
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EMVL.L
11.5%
JRDM.L
10.7%

Basic Materials

EMVL.L
10.0%
JRDM.L
5.9%

Energy

EMVL.L
8.1%
JRDM.L
4.5%

Industrials

EMVL.L
2.7%
JRDM.L
6.8%

Communication Services

EMVL.L
2.5%
JRDM.L
7.3%

Real Estate

EMVL.L
1.8%
JRDM.L
0.4%

Healthcare

EMVL.L
1.7%
JRDM.L
2.7%

Utilities

EMVL.L
1.4%
JRDM.L
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

EMVL.L
1.1%
JRDM.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMVL.L
EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

JRDM.L
JRDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JRDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMVL.LJRDM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.58

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.25

5.11

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.10

18.41

+6.69

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is comparable to the JRDM.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMVL.L and JRDM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMVL.LJRDM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07

3.33

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

2.05

-1.24

Drawdowns

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMVL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than JRDM.L's maximum drawdown of -16.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMVL.L and JRDM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMVL.LJRDM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-16.06%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-12.79%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-2.66%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-2.93%

-7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.41%

-0.02%

Volatility

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) at 8.41%. This indicates that EMVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMVL.LJRDM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

8.41%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

16.19%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

19.65%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

23.26%

-3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

23.26%

-1.02%

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMVL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JRDM.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMVL.L vs. JRDM.L - Dividend Comparison

EMVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EMVL.L and JRDM.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JRDM.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRDM.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EMVL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EMVL.L and 0.30% for JRDM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMVL.L and JRDM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer