EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EMVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)) and FNCW.L (SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMVL.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while FNCW.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMVL.L returned 15.75%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for FNCW.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMVL.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FNCW.L.

Performance

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EMVL.L is traded in USD, while FNCW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FNCW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMVL.L achieves a 38.92% return, which is significantly higher than FNCW.L's 3.58% return.

EMVL.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 38.92%
• 6M: 41.22%
• 1Y: 69.31%
• 3Y*: 35.90%
• 5Y*: 15.75%
• 10Y*: —

FNCW.L

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 3.58%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 17.06%
• 3Y*: 25.29%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: 9.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMVL.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)	38.92%	43.13%	14.49%	18.37%	-16.29%	5.29%	7.72%	17.64%	-2.10%
FNCW.L SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF	3.58%	29.48%	26.60%	15.73%	-33.29%	26.73%	0.14%	30.57%	-6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EMVL.L and FNCW.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018	0.54

The correlation between EMVL.L and FNCW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMVL.L	FNCW.L
Technology	49.0%	1.2%
Financial Services	16.6%	98.3%
Basic Materials	9.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	0.1%
Energy	6.9%	0.1%
Industrials	3.7%	0.2%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.1%
Healthcare	1.6%	0.1%
Communication Services	1.6%	-
Utilities	1.5%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMVL.L

EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FNCW.L

FNCW.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
FNCW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FNCW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FNCW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FNCW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FNCW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMVL.L	FNCW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.05	1.27	+1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	1.92	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.22	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.92	1.49	+4.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.48	4.98	+13.50

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the FNCW.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMVL.L and FNCW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMVL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum FNCW.L drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMVL.L and FNCW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMVL.L	FNCW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.95%	-54.46%	+19.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.65%	-11.41%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.42%	-15.90%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.55%	-47.30%	+13.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-54.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.47%	-0.57%	-6.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.51%	-15.89%	+6.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	3.41%	+0.33%

Volatility

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a higher volatility of 11.06% compared to SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) at 3.70%. This indicates that EMVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMVL.L	FNCW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.06%	3.70%	+7.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.02%	10.84%	+9.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.75%	13.54%	+9.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.44%	20.80%	-0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.29%	22.55%	-1.26%

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMVL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMVL.L vs. FNCW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMVL.L nor FNCW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMVL.L and FNCW.L in my portfolio?

EMVL.L and FNCW.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMVL.L or FNCW.L?

On fees, FNCW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMVL.L or FNCW.L?

FNCW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EMVL.L.

What is the main difference between EMVL.L and FNCW.L?

EMVL.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FNCW.L is Financials Equities. EMVL.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while FNCW.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EMVL.L and 0.30% for FNCW.L.