EMVL.L vs. AINF.L
EMVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)) and AINF.L (iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - EMVL.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while AINF.L is a Technology Equities fund managed by iShares. Over the past year, EMVL.L returned 85.89% vs 118.44% for AINF.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
EMVL.L vs. AINF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMVL.L is traded in USD, while AINF.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AINF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMVL.L achieves a 43.83% return, which is significantly lower than AINF.L's 57.19% return.
EMVL.L
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 43.83%
- 6M
- 48.06%
- 1Y
- 85.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.66%
- 5Y*
- 16.16%
- 10Y*
- —
AINF.L
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 21.67%
- YTD
- 57.19%
- 6M
- 58.70%
- 1Y
- 118.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMVL.L vs. AINF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMVL.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) | 43.83% | 43.13% | -2.60% |
AINF.L iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 57.19% | 44.91% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMVL.L and AINF.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EMVL.L and AINF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMVL.L vs. AINF.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMVL.L
AINF.L
EMVL.L vs. AINF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMVL.L | AINF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.71 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.25 | 9.82 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.10 | 32.23 | -7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMVL.L | AINF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07 | 4.83 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 2.65 | -1.84 |
Drawdowns
EMVL.L vs. AINF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMVL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than AINF.L's maximum drawdown of -28.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMVL.L and AINF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMVL.L | AINF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -28.05% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -11.99% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.20% | -1.90% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -4.28% | -5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 3.66% | -0.27% |
Volatility
EMVL.L vs. AINF.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) have volatilities of 9.56% and 9.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMVL.L | AINF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 9.66% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.52% | 18.82% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.79% | 24.37% | -3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 27.46% | -7.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 27.46% | -5.22% |
Dividends
EMVL.L vs. AINF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMVL.L nor AINF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMVL.L and AINF.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMVL.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AINF.L is Technology Equities.
Find the right allocation for EMVL.L and AINF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer