EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMUS.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF) and FTGE.DE (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc) are both Europe Equities funds - EMUS.DE tracks the MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped while FTGE.DE tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® Eurozone. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMUS.DE returned 7.85%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for FTGE.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMUS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FTGE.DE.

Performance

EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF (EMUS.DE) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FTGE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMUS.DE achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than FTGE.DE's 13.73% return.

EMUS.DE

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 7.56%
• 6M: 9.47%
• 1Y: 12.57%
• 3Y*: 12.58%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: —

FTGE.DE

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 6M: 16.86%
• 1Y: 30.85%
• 3Y*: 22.56%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMUS.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF	7.56%	15.33%	10.65%	11.79%	-13.95%	30.31%	4.55%
FTGE.DE First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc	13.73%	39.79%	9.52%	12.43%	-14.37%	20.47%	9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between EMUS.DE and FTGE.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020	0.69

The correlation between EMUS.DE and FTGE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMUS.DE

EMUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 27
EMUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
EMUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EMUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 27
EMUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
EMUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FTGE.DE

FTGE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
FTGE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FTGE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FTGE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FTGE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FTGE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF (EMUS.DE) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FTGE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMUS.DE	FTGE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	2.16	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	2.95	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.40	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	3.27	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	12.30	-8.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMUS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the FTGE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMUS.DE and FTGE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMUS.DE	FTGE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	2.16	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.65	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.88	-0.10

Drawdowns

EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMUS.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, smaller than the maximum FTGE.DE drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMUS.DE and FTGE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMUS.DE	FTGE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.16%	-26.63%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.86%	-9.38%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.11%	-16.12%	+3.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-26.63%	+1.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.64%	-5.40%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	2.50%	+0.69%

Volatility

EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF (EMUS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FTGE.DE) at 3.83%. This indicates that EMUS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMUS.DE	FTGE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	3.83%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.27%	11.63%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.34%	14.23%	-0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.68%	17.58%	-0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	18.41%	-1.06%

EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMUS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGE.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMUS.DE vs. FTGE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMUS.DE nor FTGE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMUS.DE and FTGE.DE in my portfolio?

EMUS.DE and FTGE.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMUS.DE or FTGE.DE?

On fees, EMUS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMUS.DE or FTGE.DE?

EMUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FTGE.DE.

What is the main difference between EMUS.DE and FTGE.DE?

EMUS.DE tracks MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while FTGE.DE tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX® Eurozone. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EMUS.DE and 0.65% for FTGE.DE.