EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMUS.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF) and ASRF.DE (BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EMUS.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while ASRF.DE is a European High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI Euro High Yield SRI Sustainable Ex Fossil Fuel. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMUS.DE returned 7.85%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for ASRF.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF (EMUS.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc (ASRF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMUS.DE achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than ASRF.DE's 0.70% return.

EMUS.DE

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 7.56%
• 6M: 9.47%
• 1Y: 12.57%
• 3Y*: 12.58%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: —

ASRF.DE

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 6M: 1.24%
• 1Y: 3.56%
• 3Y*: 6.65%
• 5Y*: 2.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMUS.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF	7.56%	15.33%	10.65%	11.79%	-13.95%	15.52%
ASRF.DE BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc	0.70%	4.66%	6.57%	11.42%	-11.08%	1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EMUS.DE and ASRF.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021	0.44

The correlation between EMUS.DE and ASRF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMUS.DE

EMUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 27
EMUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
EMUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EMUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 27
EMUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
EMUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

ASRF.DE

ASRF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 27
ASRF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ASRF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ASRF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ASRF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ASRF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF (EMUS.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc (ASRF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMUS.DE	ASRF.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	0.93	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.54	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.18	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	1.09	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	4.34	-0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMUS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the ASRF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMUS.DE and ASRF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMUS.DE	ASRF.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	0.93	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.43	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.45	+0.33

Drawdowns

EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMUS.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, which is greater than ASRF.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMUS.DE and ASRF.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMUS.DE	ASRF.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.16%	-16.76%	-8.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.86%	-3.25%	-7.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.11%	-3.86%	-9.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-16.76%	-8.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.34%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.64%	-4.24%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	0.82%	+2.37%

Volatility

EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF (EMUS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc (ASRF.DE) at 1.05%. This indicates that EMUS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMUS.DE	ASRF.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	1.05%	+3.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.27%	3.20%	+8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.34%	3.80%	+9.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.68%	5.85%	+10.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	5.83%	+11.52%

EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMUS.DE and ASRF.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EMUS.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMUS.DE nor ASRF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMUS.DE and ASRF.DE in my portfolio?

EMUS.DE and ASRF.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMUS.DE or ASRF.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMUS.DE or ASRF.DE?

EMUS.DE and ASRF.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between EMUS.DE and ASRF.DE?

EMUS.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while ASRF.DE is European High Yield Bonds. EMUS.DE tracks MSCI EMU SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while ASRF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro High Yield SRI Sustainable Ex Fossil Fuel.