EMUM.L vs. CMB1.L
EMUM.L (iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EMUM.L tracks the MSCI EMU Mid Cap Net Index while CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMUM.L returned 19.92%/yr vs 28.04%/yr for CMB1.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMUM.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CMB1.L.
Performance
EMUM.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMUM.L is traded in EUR, while CMB1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMB1.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMUM.L achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 20.34% return.
EMUM.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMB1.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 17.90%
- YTD
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 37.10%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.64%
- 10Y*
- 16.08%
EMUM.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMUM.L iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 13.16% | 31.38% | 11.63% | 9.56% | -14.55% |
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) | 20.34% | 36.33% | 18.72% | 33.45% | -9.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMUM.L and CMB1.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2022 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, EMUM.L and CMB1.L have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMUM.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMUM.L
CMB1.L
EMUM.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (EMUM.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMUM.L | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 3.95 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.65 | 14.30 | -4.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMUM.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMUM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, smaller than the maximum CMB1.L drawdown of -52.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMUM.L and CMB1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMUM.L | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.13% | -52.45% | +29.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -9.35% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.40% | -17.56% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -0.85% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -14.46% | +11.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.59% | -0.38% |
Volatility
EMUM.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (EMUM.L) is 3.11%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that EMUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMUM.L | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 3.70% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 12.43% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 15.22% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 18.12% | +7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 20.25% | +5.32% |
EMUM.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMUM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMUM.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMUM.L nor CMB1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMUM.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMB1.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMB1.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMUM.L.
EMUM.L tracks MSCI EMU Mid Cap Net Index, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMUM.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.
Find the right allocation for EMUM.L and CMB1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer