EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMUD.L (iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and FTEU.L (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from iShares and First Trust respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMUD.L returned 7.08%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for FTEU.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMUD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FTEU.L.

Performance

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMUD.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EMUD.L is traded in GBP, while FTEU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTEU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMUD.L achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than FTEU.L's 12.78% return.

EMUD.L

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 7.97%
• 6M: 8.86%
• 1Y: 17.03%
• 3Y*: 12.26%
• 5Y*: 7.08%
• 10Y*: —

FTEU.L

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 6M: 15.33%
• 1Y: 34.02%
• 3Y*: 22.63%
• 5Y*: 11.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMUD.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	7.97%	24.33%	2.24%	12.63%	-10.09%	11.93%	5.31%	9.38%
FTEU.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares	12.75%	46.50%	4.57%	10.67%	-9.18%	12.84%	1.98%	8.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EMUD.L and FTEU.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019	0.85

The correlation between EMUD.L and FTEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMUD.L	FTEU.L
Financial Services	24.6%	10.6%
Industrials	20.5%	27.4%
Technology	17.0%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	9.2%
Utilities	6.7%	8.3%
Healthcare	5.7%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	5.3%
Communication Services	5.2%	3.7%
Energy	3.2%	10.8%
Basic Materials	2.2%	7.5%
Real Estate	1.5%	6.0%

Return for Risk

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMUD.L

EMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
EMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
EMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FTEU.L

FTEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FTEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FTEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FTEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FTEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMUD.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMUD.L	FTEU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	2.16	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.85	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.40	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	3.23	-1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.18	11.93	-6.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMUD.L and FTEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMUD.L	FTEU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	2.16	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.66	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.58	-0.11

Drawdowns

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMUD.L drawdown since its inception was -30.22%, smaller than the maximum FTEU.L drawdown of -35.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMUD.L and FTEU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMUD.L	FTEU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.22%	-35.87%	+5.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-10.50%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.57%	-13.83%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.91%	-24.32%	-0.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.15%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.81%	-6.50%	+0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.33%	2.84%	+0.49%

Volatility

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMUD.L) is 4.54%, while First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that EMUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMUD.L	FTEU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	5.05%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.69%	13.09%	-1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.39%	15.67%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	17.71%	-1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	18.31%	-0.30%

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMUD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FTEU.L's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMUD.L vs. FTEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMUD.L nor FTEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMUD.L and FTEU.L in my portfolio?

EMUD.L and FTEU.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMUD.L or FTEU.L?

On fees, EMUD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMUD.L or FTEU.L?

EMUD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FTEU.L.

What is the main difference between EMUD.L and FTEU.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EMUD.L and 0.80% for FTEU.L.