EMRGX vs. TRBCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX).
EMRGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on May 29, 1986. TRBCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993.
Performance
EMRGX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMRGX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMRGX Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. | -2.01% | 31.55% | 1.06% | 8.09% | -24.69% | -0.73% | 21.56% | 23.99% | -14.56% | 41.31% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | -14.57% | 18.78% | 48.46% | 49.42% | -38.57% | 17.54% | 34.73% | 29.97% | 2.00% | 36.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMRGX achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's -14.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EMRGX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 7.19%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.42% annualized return.
EMRGX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -12.37%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
TRBCX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.85%
- YTD
- -14.57%
- 6M
- -12.81%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMRGX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMRGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMRGX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank
EMRGX
TRBCX
EMRGX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMRGX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 0.51 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 0.89 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.13 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 0.49 | +1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 1.72 | +4.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMRGX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 0.51 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.42 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.68 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.57 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMRGX and TRBCX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMRGX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison
EMRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than TRBCX's 6.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMRGX Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. | 4.04% | 3.96% | 0.00% | 1.51% | 1.34% | 11.22% | 6.63% | 5.89% | 2.21% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | 6.14% | 5.25% | 18.16% | 3.49% | 5.87% | 9.38% | 1.19% | 0.36% | 2.44% | 2.94% | 0.67% | 3.26% |
Drawdowns
EMRGX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMRGX drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRGX and TRBCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMRGX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.84% | -54.56% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -17.01% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.80% | -43.63% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | -43.63% | +0.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.38% | -17.01% | +3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -11.35% | -5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 4.86% | -1.63% |
Volatility
EMRGX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison
Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) at 5.58%. This indicates that EMRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMRGX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 5.58% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 13.15% | -1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 23.22% | -6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 24.00% | -7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 22.73% | -5.25% |