EMRGX vs. ^NDX
EMRGX (Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc.) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while ^NDX (NASDAQ 100 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, EMRGX returned 10.00%/yr vs 21.21%/yr for ^NDX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMRGX achieves a 24.94% return, which is significantly higher than ^NDX's 16.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EMRGX has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 10.00%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.21% annualized return.
EMRGX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 24.94%
- 6M
- 25.68%
- 1Y
- 44.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
^NDX
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- 25.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 21.21%
EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMRGX Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. | 24.94% | 31.55% | 1.06% | 8.09% | -24.69% | -0.73% | 21.56% | 23.99% | -14.56% | 41.31% |
^NDX NASDAQ 100 Index | 16.23% | 20.17% | 24.88% | 53.81% | -32.97% | 26.63% | 47.58% | 37.96% | -1.04% | 31.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMRGX and ^NDX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2014 | 0.60 |
The correlation between EMRGX and ^NDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMRGX vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank
EMRGX
^NDX
EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMRGX | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 2.84 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | 10.49 | +2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMRGX drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRGX and ^NDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMRGX | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.84% | -82.90% | +40.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -12.12% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -22.93% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.74% | -35.56% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | -35.56% | -7.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.28% | +4.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -24.60% | +8.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.28% | +0.22% |
Volatility
EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) is 8.09%, while NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that EMRGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMRGX | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.09% | 9.08% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 14.56% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 18.03% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 22.89% | -5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 22.65% | -4.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMRGX and ^NDX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^NDX has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to EMRGX (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMRGX dropped -42.84% vs ^NDX's -82.90%.
EMRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMRGX and ^NDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer