PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMRGX vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMRGX achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly higher than ^NDX's 11.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EMRGX has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 8.25%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.61% annualized return.


EMRGX

1D
3.27%
1M
-2.30%
6M
7.83%
YTD
15.60%
1Y
30.94%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
8.25%
ALL TIME*
5.10%

^NDX

1D
0.60%
1M
-3.60%
6M
10.65%
YTD
11.98%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
19.61%
ALL TIME*
14.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$205.94T$218.36T$280.11T
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMRGX
Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc.
15.60%31.55%1.06%8.09%-24.69%-0.73%21.56%23.99%-14.56%41.31%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
11.98%20.17%24.88%53.81%-32.97%26.63%47.58%37.96%-1.04%31.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EMRGX and ^NDX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2014

0.61

The correlation between EMRGX and ^NDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMRGX vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMRGX
EMRGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EMRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EMRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMRGX^NDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.80

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.10

5.76

+1.35

EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMRGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMRGX and ^NDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMRGX drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRGX and ^NDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMRGX^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-82.90%

+40.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-12.12%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-22.93%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.00%

-35.56%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.84%

-35.56%

-7.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.47%

-7.78%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.06%

-24.55%

+8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

3.79%

+0.14%

Volatility

EMRGX vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) at 6.81%. This indicates that EMRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMRGX^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

6.81%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

15.99%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

19.37%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

23.09%

-5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

22.73%

-4.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMRGX and ^NDX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMRGX has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to ^NDX (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMRGX dropped -42.84% vs ^NDX's -82.90%.

EMRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMRGX and ^NDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer