EMRGX vs. EMXC
EMRGX (Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc.) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both funds - EMRGX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Over the past 5 years, EMRGX returned 3.50%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for EMXC. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMRGX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
EMRGX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMRGX achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 38.31% return.
EMRGX
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 21.04%
- 6M
- 21.62%
- 1Y
- 36.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
EMXC
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 38.31%
- 6M
- 39.71%
- 1Y
- 64.42%
- 3Y*
- 27.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EMRGX vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMRGX Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. | 21.04% | 31.55% | 1.06% | 8.09% | -24.69% | -0.73% | 21.56% | 23.99% | -14.56% | 11.57% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 38.31% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMRGX and EMXC is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between EMRGX and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMRGX vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
EMRGX
EMXC
EMRGX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMRGX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 4.49 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.33 | 17.10 | -5.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMRGX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMRGX drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, roughly equal to the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRGX and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMRGX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.84% | -42.81% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -14.41% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -19.12% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.74% | -28.91% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -6.16% | +3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.15% | -10.15% | -6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.78% | -0.27% |
Volatility
EMRGX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) is 8.66%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that EMRGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMRGX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.66% | 14.74% | -6.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.16% | 23.43% | -8.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 25.26% | -7.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 18.40% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 20.24% | -2.53% |
EMRGX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMRGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMRGX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
EMRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than EMXC's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMRGX Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. | 3.27% | 3.96% | 0.00% | 1.51% | 1.34% | 11.22% | 6.63% | 5.89% | 2.21% | 1.11% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 1.93% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMRGX and EMXC have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to EMRGX (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMRGX dropped -42.84% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMRGX and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer