PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQQ.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ.L achieves a -18.98% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 23.04% return.


EMQQ.L

1D
-3.07%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-18.98%
6M
-20.64%
1Y
-17.05%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
-11.57%
10Y*

IUIT.L

1D
-2.11%
1M
13.14%
YTD
23.04%
6M
22.75%
1Y
51.87%
3Y*
34.42%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*
26.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMQQ.L
EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating
-18.98%18.91%13.12%4.40%-31.74%-32.94%82.79%30.21%-9.00%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
23.04%22.93%38.51%59.45%-29.15%34.09%43.14%48.90%-15.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ.L and IUIT.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2018

0.56

The correlation between EMQQ.L and IUIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMQQ.L
IUIT.L

Consumer Cyclical

51.9%

-

Communication Services

20.2%

-

Financial Services

19.4%

-

Technology

6.7%
99.6%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Healthcare

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

EMQQ.L
51.9%
IUIT.L

-

Communication Services

EMQQ.L
20.2%
IUIT.L

-

Financial Services

EMQQ.L
19.4%
IUIT.L

-

Technology

EMQQ.L
6.7%
IUIT.L
99.6%

Real Estate

EMQQ.L
0.9%
IUIT.L

-

Healthcare

EMQQ.L
0.9%
IUIT.L

-

Basic Materials

EMQQ.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

EMQQ.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Energy

EMQQ.L

-

IUIT.L
0.1%

Industrials

EMQQ.L

-

IUIT.L
0.0%

Utilities

EMQQ.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ.L
EMQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
EMQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQQ.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQQ.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.41

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

3.03

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

8.99

-10.00

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQQ.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

2.55

-3.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

1.02

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

1.16

-1.11

Drawdowns

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -73.83%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQ.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.83%

-33.46%

-40.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.49%

-17.03%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.49%

-26.40%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.44%

-33.46%

-32.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.58%

-3.14%

-55.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.27%

-6.02%

-32.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.29%

5.76%

+9.53%

Volatility

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQQ.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) have volatilities of 7.51% and 7.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQQ.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

7.49%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

15.53%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.04%

20.28%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.92%

23.61%

+9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.41%

22.47%

+9.94%

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ.L has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQQ.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMQQ.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQQ.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.L.

EMQQ.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQQ.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer