EMQIX vs. DRESX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EMQIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund) and DRESX (Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EMQIX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for DRESX.

Performance

EMQIX vs. DRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EMQIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DRESX

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -8.67%
• 6M: -3.73%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 1Y: 17.57%
• 3Y*: 13.48%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 9.10%
• ALL TIME*: 7.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EMQIX vs. DRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMQIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund	13.16%	32.62%	10.11%	5.11%	-24.36%	-3.93%	15.57%	24.50%	-13.19%	38.29%
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	4.11%	24.08%	14.86%	10.30%	-21.17%	15.93%	33.56%	33.70%	-24.00%	33.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQIX and DRESX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2016	0.73

The correlation between EMQIX and DRESX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMQIX vs. DRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMQIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRESX

DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 22
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMQIX vs. DRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund (EMQIX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMQIX	DRESX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.94	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.36	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.18	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.85	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.08	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EMQIX	DRESX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.38%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.40%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.88%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-17.88%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.92%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMQIX	DRESX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.55%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.42%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	16.23%	—

EMQIX vs. DRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than DRESX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMQIX vs. DRESX - Dividend Comparison

EMQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than DRESX's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	2.16%	2.25%	0.68%	1.09%	0.00%	0.04%	0.65%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMQIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Equity Fund	4.24%	5.27%	2.49%	1.73%	0.69%	35.77%	0.73%	1.31%	11.37%	9.50%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMQIX and DRESX in my portfolio?

EMQIX and DRESX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.