EMPTX vs. FGOMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMPTX (UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund) and FGOMX (Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, EMPTX returned 6.59%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for FGOMX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMPTX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FGOMX.

Performance

EMPTX vs. FGOMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMPTX achieves a 30.51% return, which is significantly lower than FGOMX's 33.73% return.

EMPTX

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 10.37%
• YTD: 30.51%
• 6M: 34.39%
• 1Y: 68.31%
• 3Y*: 26.97%
• 5Y*: 6.59%
• 10Y*: —

FGOMX

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 11.58%
• YTD: 33.73%
• 6M: 37.15%
• 1Y: 64.79%
• 3Y*: 27.19%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMPTX vs. FGOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	30.51%	43.82%	2.51%	8.92%	-25.38%	-9.36%	24.79%	14.98%	0.55%
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund	33.73%	34.20%	7.88%	12.23%	-22.45%	-0.19%	22.10%	22.25%	-4.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EMPTX and FGOMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018	0.81

The correlation between EMPTX and FGOMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMPTX vs. FGOMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMPTX

EMPTX Risk / Return Rank: 94
EMPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EMPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EMPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EMPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EMPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FGOMX

FGOMX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FGOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FGOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FGOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FGOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMPTX vs. FGOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMPTX	FGOMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.00	4.34	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.80	5.42	-0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.76	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	6.32	-1.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.43	24.86	-4.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMPTX vs. FGOMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMPTX Sharpe Ratio is 4.00, which is comparable to the FGOMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMPTX and FGOMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMPTX	FGOMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.00	4.34	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.54	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.65	-0.16

Drawdowns

EMPTX vs. FGOMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMPTX drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, which is greater than FGOMX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMPTX and FGOMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMPTX	FGOMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.03%	-40.14%	-5.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.50%	-12.77%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.50%	-16.71%	+1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.46%	-38.04%	-3.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.37%	-13.36%	-5.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	3.24%	+0.30%

Volatility

EMPTX vs. FGOMX - Volatility Comparison

UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) have volatilities of 7.75% and 7.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMPTX	FGOMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.75%	7.45%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.12%	15.74%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.72%	18.63%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.28%	17.86%	+1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.37%	19.31%	+0.06%

EMPTX vs. FGOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMPTX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FGOMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EMPTX vs. FGOMX - Dividend Comparison

EMPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FGOMX's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	1.47%	1.91%	3.40%	3.20%	3.84%	11.93%	1.50%	2.75%	0.54%
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund	1.62%	2.17%	2.40%	2.83%	2.42%	4.63%	0.73%	2.13%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMPTX and FGOMX in my portfolio?

EMPTX and FGOMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMPTX or FGOMX?

EMPTX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to FGOMX (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMPTX dropped -46.03% vs FGOMX's -40.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.34 vs 4.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.