PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMPTX vs. FCEEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMPTX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMPTX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMPTX
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund
-0.19%43.82%2.51%8.92%-25.38%-9.36%24.79%12.58%
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
1.82%34.81%10.51%12.52%-16.96%-1.29%10.19%9.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMPTX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than FCEEX's 1.82% return.


EMPTX

1D
-0.94%
1M
-14.50%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
5.92%
1Y
34.87%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*

FCEEX

1D
-0.96%
1M
-11.83%
YTD
1.82%
6M
5.92%
1Y
31.80%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMPTX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMPTX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EMPTX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMPTX
EMPTX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EMPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FCEEX
FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMPTX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMPTXFCEEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

1.80

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.33

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.33

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.59

9.14

+0.45

EMPTX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMPTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMPTX and FCEEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMPTXFCEEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.80

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.35

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.47

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between EMPTX and FCEEX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EMPTX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

EMPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than FCEEX's 3.23% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EMPTX
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund
1.92%1.91%3.40%3.20%3.84%11.93%1.50%2.75%0.54%
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
3.23%3.29%4.17%4.36%4.08%3.38%2.98%0.40%0.00%

Drawdowns

EMPTX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMPTX drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMPTX and FCEEX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMPTXFCEEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.03%

-34.68%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-12.98%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.73%

-33.96%

-7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.50%

-12.98%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-11.50%

-7.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.30%

+0.57%

Volatility

EMPTX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) at 8.12%. This indicates that EMPTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCEEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMPTXFCEEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.90%

8.12%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

13.24%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

17.66%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

16.53%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

18.16%

+1.05%