EMOT vs. CPSL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EMOT (First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF) and CPSL (Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMOT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Economic Moat Index, while CPSL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. EMOT is passively managed, while CPSL is actively managed. Over the past year, EMOT returned 18.68% vs 7.06% for CPSL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMOT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CPSL.

Performance

EMOT vs. CPSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) and Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMOT achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than CPSL's 2.56% return.

EMOT

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 6M: 8.78%
• 1Y: 18.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CPSL

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 2.56%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 7.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMOT vs. CPSL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMOT First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF	9.61%	14.17%	5.09%
CPSL Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF	2.56%	6.43%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EMOT and CPSL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2024	0.70

The correlation between EMOT and CPSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMOT vs. CPSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMOT

EMOT Risk / Return Rank: 46
EMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
EMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
EMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
EMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

CPSL

CPSL Risk / Return Rank: 94
CPSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CPSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CPSL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CPSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CPSL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMOT vs. CPSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) and Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMOT	CPSL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	3.17	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	5.14	-2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.63	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	6.02	-3.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.00	30.35	-22.35

EMOT vs. CPSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the CPSL Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMOT and CPSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMOT vs. CPSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMOT drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, which is greater than CPSL's maximum drawdown of -3.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMOT and CPSL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMOT	CPSL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-3.72%	-12.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	-1.18%	-8.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.28%	-0.25%	-2.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-0.33%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	0.23%	+2.11%

Volatility

EMOT vs. CPSL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) at 0.57%. This indicates that EMOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMOT	CPSL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	0.57%	+3.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	1.62%	+7.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	2.24%	+9.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	3.32%	+11.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.95%	3.32%	+11.63%

EMOT vs. CPSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMOT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMOT vs. CPSL - Dividend Comparison

EMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while CPSL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CPSL Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMOT First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF	1.08%	0.84%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMOT and CPSL in my portfolio?

EMOT and CPSL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMOT or CPSL?

EMOT has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to CPSL (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMOT dropped -16.41% vs CPSL's -3.72%.

Which ETF is better, EMOT or CPSL?

On 1-year performance, EMOT leads with 18.68% vs 7.06% for CPSL. On fees, EMOT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CPSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMOT or CPSL?

Over the 1-year period, EMOT has performed better with a 18.68% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMOT or CPSL?

EMOT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CPSL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMOT or CPSL?

EMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for CPSL.

What is the main difference between EMOT and CPSL?

EMOT is categorized as S&P 500, while CPSL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMOT and 0.79% for CPSL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.