PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMO vs. TFEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMO vs. TFEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. (EMO) and Templeton Institutional Fund International Equity Series (TFEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMO achieves a 20.68% return, which is significantly higher than TFEQX's 13.92% return. Over the past 10 years, EMO has underperformed TFEQX with an annualized return of 7.31%, while TFEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.98% annualized return.


EMO

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.73%
6M
11.46%
YTD
20.68%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
29.46%
5Y*
30.65%
10Y*
7.31%
ALL TIME*
4.24%

TFEQX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.65%
6M
6.29%
YTD
13.92%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
8.98%
ALL TIME*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.88M$2.05M$2.43M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EMO vs. TFEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc.
20.68%7.38%44.45%31.76%40.13%74.70%-64.47%19.60%-25.73%0.07%
TFEQX
Templeton Institutional Fund International Equity Series
13.92%31.58%9.44%22.68%-9.21%5.70%5.29%11.56%-17.40%19.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EMO and TFEQX is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2011

0.41

The correlation between EMO and TFEQX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMO vs. TFEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMO
EMO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TFEQX
TFEQX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TFEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TFEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMO vs. TFEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. (EMO) and Templeton Institutional Fund International Equity Series (TFEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMOTFEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.26

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

8.07

-4.13

EMO vs. TFEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the TFEQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMO and TFEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMO vs. TFEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMO drawdown since its inception was -95.06%, which is greater than TFEQX's maximum drawdown of -57.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMO and TFEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMOTFEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.06%

-57.70%

-37.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-11.56%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-16.94%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.59%

-29.20%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.02%

-42.65%

-50.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-3.01%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.66%

-10.47%

-21.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

3.23%

+2.01%

Volatility

EMO vs. TFEQX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. (EMO) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Templeton Institutional Fund International Equity Series (TFEQX) at 4.11%. This indicates that EMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMOTFEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.11%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

14.40%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

16.84%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.05%

18.84%

+7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.14%

17.37%

+23.77%

EMO vs. TFEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMO has a 3.22% expense ratio, which is higher than TFEQX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMO vs. TFEQX - Dividend Comparison

EMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, less than TFEQX's 37.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc.
8.41%9.41%7.16%6.79%6.71%6.71%15.82%10.94%16.39%10.85%9.76%11.88%
TFEQX
Templeton Institutional Fund International Equity Series
37.61%42.84%16.75%14.08%6.20%34.04%6.78%6.65%22.18%1.60%3.46%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMO and TFEQX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMO has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to TFEQX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMO dropped -95.06% vs TFEQX's -57.70%.

TFEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMO and TFEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer