EMO vs. SBLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX).
EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011. SBLGX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Aug 29, 1997.
Performance
EMO vs. SBLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMO vs. SBLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 16.71% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
SBLGX ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund | -9.62% | 8.44% | 27.60% | 45.00% | -32.96% | 21.71% | 30.84% | 31.69% | -0.44% | 25.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMO achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than SBLGX's -9.62% return. Over the past 10 years, EMO has underperformed SBLGX with an annualized return of 9.14%, while SBLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.03% annualized return.
EMO
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 33.42%
- 5Y*
- 32.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
SBLGX
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- -5.64%
- YTD
- -9.62%
- 6M
- -10.67%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMO vs. SBLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMO has a 13.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SBLGX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMO vs. SBLGX — Risk / Return Rank
EMO
SBLGX
EMO vs. SBLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMO | SBLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.28 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 0.57 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.08 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 0.36 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 1.17 | +1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMO | SBLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.28 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 0.37 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.64 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.46 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMO and SBLGX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMO vs. SBLGX - Dividend Comparison
EMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, less than SBLGX's 14.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.40% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
SBLGX ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund | 14.03% | 12.68% | 5.39% | 12.39% | 9.34% | 12.48% | 6.17% | 5.12% | 4.00% | 4.41% | 2.08% | 2.94% |
Drawdowns
EMO vs. SBLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMO drawdown since its inception was -95.06%, which is greater than SBLGX's maximum drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMO and SBLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMO | SBLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.06% | -53.64% | -41.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.81% | -16.95% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.59% | -38.28% | +9.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.02% | -38.28% | -54.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -13.93% | +8.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -12.97% | -19.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.23% | 5.27% | +0.96% |
Volatility
EMO vs. SBLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) is 5.53%, while ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that EMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMO | SBLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 6.71% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 12.01% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.67% | 21.27% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 21.14% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.42% | 20.40% | +21.02% |