PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) and L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMNE.DE is traded in EUR, while ISPY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISPY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMNE.DE achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than ISPY.L's 48.83% return.


EMNE.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.09%
6M
8.22%
YTD
9.92%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.44%

ISPY.L

1D
0.93%
1M
14.02%
6M
53.13%
YTD
48.83%
1Y
44.36%
3Y*
27.75%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
16.52%
ALL TIME*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMNE.DE
iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
9.92%22.18%9.86%18.79%-12.35%22.75%1.44%16.09%
ISPY.L
L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF
48.83%-4.95%25.46%37.20%-28.46%16.29%29.78%11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EMNE.DE and ISPY.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.41

The correlation between EMNE.DE and ISPY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNE.DE
EMNE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EMNE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ISPY.L
ISPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) and L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMNE.DEISPY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.25

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.34

5.83

+0.52

EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNE.DE and ISPY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum ISPY.L drawdown of -53.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNE.DE and ISPY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMNE.DEISPY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-53.22%

+18.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-19.63%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-30.52%

+15.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.70%

-33.97%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-4.03%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-15.77%

+10.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

7.59%

-4.63%

Volatility

EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) is 3.80%, while L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that EMNE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISPY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMNE.DEISPY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

10.70%

-6.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.63%

25.07%

-12.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

28.16%

-13.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

28.25%

-12.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

25.03%

-5.05%

EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMNE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPY.L's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMNE.DE vs. ISPY.L - Dividend Comparison

EMNE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, while ISPY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMNE.DE
iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.39%2.61%2.95%3.17%3.34%2.40%1.85%2.67%
ISPY.L
L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMNE.DE and ISPY.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMNE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMNE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ISPY.L.

EMNE.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while ISPY.L is Cybersecurity. EMNE.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while ISPY.L tracks ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EMNE.DE and 0.69% for ISPY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMNE.DE and ISPY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer