PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMND.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMND.DE achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return.


EMND.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
3.68%
YTD
10.17%
6M
10.17%
1Y
21.70%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*

EUNL.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.29%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMND.DE
iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.17%6.20%25.02%18.82%-15.24%33.96%7.28%12.63%
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.86%7.90%25.93%20.13%-13.59%32.71%5.48%11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EMND.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.99

The correlation between EMND.DE and EUNL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMND.DE
EMND.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMND.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMND.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMND.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EMND.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMND.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNL.DE
EUNL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMND.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMND.DEEUNL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.64

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.00

14.52

-2.52

EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMND.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMND.DE and EUNL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMND.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.12

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.90

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.82

-0.02

Drawdowns

EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMND.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMND.DE and EUNL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMND.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-33.63%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-6.50%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.24%

-21.73%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.24%

-21.73%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.31%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-4.25%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.64%

+0.17%

Volatility

EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMND.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) have volatilities of 2.65% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMND.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.62%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

7.72%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

11.16%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.24%

14.17%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

15.17%

+1.13%

EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMND.DE and EUNL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMND.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison

EMND.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while EUNL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMND.DE
iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.93%1.03%1.28%1.47%2.54%1.70%1.83%1.30%
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, EMND.DE and EUNL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMND.DE and EUNL.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

EMND.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMND.DE and EUNL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer