EMND.DE vs. WEBG.DE
EMND.DE (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and WEBG.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist) are both Global Equities funds - EMND.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus while WEBG.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMND.DE returned 21.82% vs 26.64% for WEBG.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EMND.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBG.DE.
Performance
EMND.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMND.DE achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than WEBG.DE's 12.80% return.
EMND.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 21.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
WEBG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 12.80%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMND.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMND.DE iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.17% | 6.20% | 16.68% |
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist | 12.80% | 9.19% | 16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMND.DE and WEBG.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024 | 0.98 |
The correlation between EMND.DE and WEBG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMND.DE vs. WEBG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMND.DE
WEBG.DE
EMND.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMND.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMND.DE | WEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 4.11 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.00 | 16.53 | -4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMND.DE | WEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.33 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 1.24 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
EMND.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMND.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than WEBG.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMND.DE and WEBG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMND.DE | WEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -21.31% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -6.50% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.63% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -2.81% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.62% | +0.19% |
Volatility
EMND.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMND.DE) is 2.65%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that EMND.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEBG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMND.DE | WEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.10% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.76% | 8.28% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 11.48% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 14.15% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 14.15% | +2.15% |
EMND.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMND.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBG.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMND.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Dividend Comparison
EMND.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while WEBG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMND.DE iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.47% | 2.54% | 1.70% | 1.83% | 1.30% |
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist | 1.22% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, EMND.DE and WEBG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WEBG.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBG.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EMND.DE.
EMND.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus, while WEBG.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EMND.DE and 0.07% for WEBG.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMND.DE and WEBG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer