EMMF vs. USFR
EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EMMF is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. EMMF is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMMF returned 11.18%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for USFR. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMMF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
EMMF vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 29.25% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.58% return.
EMMF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 29.25%
- 6M
- 30.61%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
EMMF vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 29.25% | 21.22% | 9.45% | 20.59% | -13.47% | 5.97% | 9.25% | 2.30% | -6.64% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.58% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMMF and USFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018 | 0.00 |
The correlation between EMMF and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMMF vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
EMMF
USFR
EMMF vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMMF | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.08 | 14.83 | -11.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 48.59 | -44.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 12.58 | -11.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 203.63 | -198.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.83 | 767.72 | -747.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMMF | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08 | 14.83 | -11.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 9.27 | -8.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.60 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
EMMF vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMMF | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.57% | -1.36% | -31.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -0.02% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.02% | -0.06% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.99% | -0.18% | -24.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -0.16% | -7.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 0.01% | +2.56% |
Volatility
EMMF vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that EMMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMMF | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 0.06% | +7.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 0.18% | +14.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 0.27% | +16.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 0.40% | +13.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 0.81% | +15.81% |
EMMF vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMMF vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 1.83% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMMF and USFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMMF has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMMF dropped -32.57% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 5-year performance, EMMF leads with 11.18% vs 3.67% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EMMF.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.83% for EMMF.
EMMF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EMMF and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.83 vs 3.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMMF and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer