EMMF vs. INDH
EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) and INDH (WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from WisdomTree. EMMF is actively managed, while INDH is passively managed. Over the past year, EMMF returned 49.05% vs -4.33% for INDH. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMMF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for INDH.
Performance
EMMF vs. INDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 28.01% return, which is significantly higher than INDH's -8.93% return.
EMMF
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 28.01%
- 6M
- 29.54%
- 1Y
- 49.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
INDH
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMMF vs. INDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 28.01% | 21.22% | 1.27% |
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund | -8.93% | 6.76% | 5.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMMF and INDH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between EMMF and INDH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMMF vs. INDH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMMF
INDH
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
EMMF
INDH
Consumer Cyclical
EMMF
INDH
Financial Services
EMMF
INDH
Communication Services
EMMF
INDH
Consumer Defensive
EMMF
INDH
Industrials
EMMF
INDH
Energy
EMMF
INDH
Utilities
EMMF
INDH
Basic Materials
EMMF
INDH
Healthcare
EMMF
INDH
Real Estate
EMMF
-
INDH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMMF vs. INDH — Risk / Return Rank
EMMF
INDH
EMMF vs. INDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMMF | INDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 0.95 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | -0.34 | +4.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.15 | -0.93 | +20.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMMF | INDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98 | -0.34 | +3.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.07 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
EMMF vs. INDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, which is greater than INDH's maximum drawdown of -15.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and INDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMMF | INDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.57% | -15.05% | -17.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -12.94% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -10.96% | +9.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -5.67% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 4.68% | -2.11% |
Volatility
EMMF vs. INDH - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) at 4.02%. This indicates that EMMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMMF | INDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 4.02% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.46% | 11.50% | +2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.57% | 12.93% | +3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 14.43% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 14.43% | +2.19% |
EMMF vs. INDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than INDH's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMMF vs. INDH - Dividend Comparison
EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than INDH's 5.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 1.85% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% |
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund | 5.77% | 5.25% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMMF and INDH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMMF has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to INDH (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMMF dropped -32.57% vs INDH's -15.05%.
On 1-year performance, EMMF leads with 49.05% vs -4.33% for INDH. On fees, EMMF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, INDH has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 49.05% return vs -4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMMF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for INDH.
INDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 1.85% for EMMF.
Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EMMF and 0.64% for INDH.
EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMMF and INDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer