EMM vs. USOY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMM (Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF) and USOY (Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Global X, while USOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EMM returned 63.51% vs 57.29% for USOY. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. EMM charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for USOY.

Performance

EMM vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMM achieves a 32.97% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.

EMM

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 10.12%
• YTD: 32.97%
• 6M: 38.50%
• 1Y: 63.51%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USOY

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -3.43%
• YTD: 62.18%
• 6M: 59.35%
• 1Y: 57.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMM vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	32.97%	30.21%	-0.42%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	62.18%	-7.93%	7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EMM and USOY is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024	-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between EMM and USOY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

EMM vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMM

EMM Risk / Return Rank: 85
EMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EMM Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EMM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

USOY

USOY Risk / Return Rank: 56
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMM vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMM	USOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	1.89	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	2.30	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.35	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	4.03	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.13	7.74	+10.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMM vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMM Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMM and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMM	USOY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.94	1.89	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	0.99	+0.18

Drawdowns

EMM vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMM drawdown since its inception was -21.99%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMM and USOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMM	USOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.99%	-17.46%	-4.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.75%	-14.29%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-5.11%	+3.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-6.47%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	7.42%	-3.91%

Volatility

EMM vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) is 9.79%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that EMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMM	USOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.79%	11.62%	-1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.28%	27.18%	-7.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.69%	30.44%	-8.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.83%	26.13%	-7.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	26.13%	-7.30%

EMM vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMM vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

EMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	0.67%	0.90%	0.80%	0.66%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	54.16%	104.32%	48.60%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMM and USOY in my portfolio?

EMM and USOY have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMM or USOY?

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to EMM (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMM dropped -21.99% vs USOY's -17.46%.

Which ETF is better, EMM or USOY?

On 1-year performance, EMM leads with 63.51% vs 57.29% for USOY. On fees, EMM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EMM has been the lower-risk option at 9.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMM or USOY?

Over the 1-year period, EMM has performed better with a 63.51% return vs 57.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMM or USOY?

EMM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMM or USOY?

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 0.67% for EMM.

What is the main difference between EMM and USOY?

EMM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMM and 1.22% for USOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.