EMM vs. FEMR
EMM (Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF) and FEMR (Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EMM returned 63.51% vs 64.21% for FEMR. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FEMR.
Performance
EMM vs. FEMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMM achieves a 32.97% return, which is significantly lower than FEMR's 34.71% return.
EMM
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 10.12%
- YTD
- 32.97%
- 6M
- 38.50%
- 1Y
- 63.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMR
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 34.71%
- 6M
- 39.19%
- 1Y
- 64.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMM vs. FEMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 32.97% | 30.21% | -2.49% |
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF | 34.71% | 35.27% | -1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMM and FEMR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between EMM and FEMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMM vs. FEMR — Risk / Return Rank
EMM
FEMR
EMM vs. FEMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) and Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMM | FEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.56 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 4.46 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.13 | 17.85 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMM | FEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 3.05 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 2.22 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
EMM vs. FEMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMM drawdown since its inception was -21.99%, which is greater than FEMR's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMM and FEMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMM | FEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.99% | -15.58% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -14.47% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -0.41% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -2.31% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.61% | -0.10% |
Volatility
EMM vs. FEMR - Volatility Comparison
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) at 8.63%. This indicates that EMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMM | FEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 8.63% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.28% | 18.52% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.69% | 21.17% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 21.28% | -2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 21.28% | -2.45% |
EMM vs. FEMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMR's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMM vs. FEMR - Dividend Comparison
EMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than FEMR's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 0.67% | 0.90% | 0.80% | 0.66% |
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF | 1.39% | 1.92% | 0.37% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMM and FEMR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMM has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to FEMR (8.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMM dropped -21.99% vs FEMR's -15.58%.
On 1-year performance, FEMR leads with 64.21% vs 63.51% for EMM. On fees, FEMR is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FEMR has been the lower-risk option at 8.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEMR has performed better with a 64.21% return vs 63.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEMR is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMM.
FEMR has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.67% for EMM.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMM and 0.38% for FEMR.
FEMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMM and FEMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer