EMLP vs. NFTY
EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMLP is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a India Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. EMLP is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMLP returned 10.12%/yr vs 7.50%/yr for NFTY. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EMLP charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
EMLP vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLP achieves a 17.75% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLP has outperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 10.12%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.50% annualized return.
EMLP
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 20.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
NFTY
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- 6M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 1Y
- -2.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.88M | $10.50M | $12.16M | |
| $2.39M | $1.68M | $1.69M |
EMLP vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 17.75% | 9.67% | 33.39% | 8.05% | 10.39% | 23.20% | -13.36% | 23.40% | -8.70% | 1.07% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -5.91% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 10.04% | 0.58% | -1.51% | 21.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLP and NFTY is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2012 | 0.25 |
The correlation between EMLP and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMLP vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMLP
NFTY
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
EMLP
NFTY
Energy
EMLP
NFTY
Industrials
EMLP
NFTY
Basic Materials
EMLP
NFTY
Communication Services
EMLP
-
NFTY
Consumer Cyclical
EMLP
-
NFTY
Consumer Defensive
EMLP
-
NFTY
Financial Services
EMLP
-
NFTY
Healthcare
EMLP
-
NFTY
Real Estate
EMLP
-
NFTY
-
Technology
EMLP
-
NFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLP vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
EMLP
NFTY
EMLP vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMLP | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.99 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | -0.14 | +3.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | -0.31 | +10.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMLP vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLP drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLP and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLP | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -47.67% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.94% | -16.14% | +11.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.47% | -21.55% | +10.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.59% | -21.55% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.61% | -47.67% | +4.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -13.99% | +12.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -9.65% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 6.98% | -5.24% |
Volatility
EMLP vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 3.54%. This indicates that EMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLP | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 3.54% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 12.71% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 14.82% | -4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 17.42% | -2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 20.64% | -2.97% |
EMLP vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLP has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMLP vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than NFTY's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.88% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLP and NFTY have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMLP has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to NFTY (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMLP dropped -43.61% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 10-year performance, EMLP leads with 10.12% vs 7.50% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EMLP has performed better with a 10.12% return vs 7.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.
EMLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.88% for NFTY.
EMLP is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while NFTY is India Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for EMLP and 0.80% for NFTY.
EMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMLP and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer