PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMLP vs. BUXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMLP vs. BUXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLP achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly higher than BUXX's 1.61% return.


EMLP

1D
-0.07%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
14.62%
6M
13.20%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
21.22%
5Y*
15.47%
10Y*
10.24%

BUXX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.99%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMLP vs. BUXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
14.62%9.67%33.39%2.63%
BUXX
Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF
1.61%4.84%6.18%2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EMLP and BUXX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2023

0.03

The correlation between EMLP and BUXX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMLP vs. BUXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLP
EMLP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BUXX
BUXX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BUXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BUXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLP vs. BUXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMLPBUXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.87

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

15.02

-11.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

61.60

-49.18

EMLP vs. BUXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the BUXX Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLP and BUXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMLPBUXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

3.63

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

3.82

-3.26

Drawdowns

EMLP vs. BUXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLP drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, which is greater than BUXX's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLP and BUXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMLPBUXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.61%

-0.60%

-43.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-0.29%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

0.00%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-0.05%

-5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

0.07%

+1.45%

Volatility

EMLP vs. BUXX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX) at 0.30%. This indicates that EMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMLPBUXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

0.30%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

0.78%

+7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

1.22%

+8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

1.46%

+13.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

1.46%

+16.23%

EMLP vs. BUXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMLP has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than BUXX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMLP vs. BUXX - Dividend Comparison

EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than BUXX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUXX
Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF
4.73%4.95%5.55%1.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
2.79%3.18%3.19%3.92%3.15%3.29%4.70%3.71%4.71%3.80%3.62%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMLP and BUXX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMLP has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to BUXX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMLP dropped -43.61% vs BUXX's -0.60%.

On 1-year performance, EMLP leads with 18.77% vs 4.41% for BUXX. On fees, BUXX is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, BUXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EMLP has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 4.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUXX is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.

BUXX has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 2.79% for EMLP.

EMLP is categorized as MLPs, while BUXX is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for EMLP and 0.26% for BUXX.

BUXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMLP and BUXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer