PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMLI.L is traded in USD, while VEMA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VEMA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLI.L achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than VEMA.L's 1.42% return.


EMLI.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.64%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
3.23%

VEMA.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.08%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.18%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMLI.L
PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
1.64%16.62%-3.24%13.68%-5.61%-5.52%1.92%8.46%
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
1.42%12.01%6.31%8.90%-15.42%-1.26%5.63%9.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EMLI.L and VEMA.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.35

The correlation between EMLI.L and VEMA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLI.L
EMLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EMLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMA.L
VEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMLI.LVEMA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.40

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.23

9.50

-4.27

EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMLI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLI.L and VEMA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMLI.LVEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.73

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.29

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.36

-0.13

Drawdowns

EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLI.L drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, which is greater than VEMA.L's maximum drawdown of -24.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLI.L and VEMA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMLI.LVEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-24.04%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-4.02%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.82%

-6.33%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.52%

-24.04%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.34%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-6.02%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.02%

+0.57%

Volatility

EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) have volatilities of 2.02% and 1.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMLI.LVEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.95%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.40%

4.27%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.49%

5.61%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.89%

8.09%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.59%

9.30%

+0.29%

EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMLI.L has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMLI.L vs. VEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

EMLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, while VEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMLI.L
PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
6.55%5.81%6.33%5.70%5.21%4.50%3.68%5.24%5.83%5.76%6.69%7.09%
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMLI.L and VEMA.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEMA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMLI.L.

EMLI.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while VEMA.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EMLI.L and 0.25% for VEMA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMLI.L and VEMA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer