EMLI.L vs. IEMB.L
EMLI.L (PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist) and IEMB.L (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, EMLI.L returned 3.23%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for IEMB.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMLI.L charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IEMB.L.
Performance
EMLI.L vs. IEMB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EMLI.L having a 1.64% return and IEMB.L slightly lower at 1.62%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EMLI.L having a 3.23% annualized return and IEMB.L not far ahead at 3.32%.
EMLI.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.23%
IEMB.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 11.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
EMLI.L vs. IEMB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLI.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 1.64% | 16.62% | -3.24% | 13.68% | -5.61% | -5.52% | 1.92% | 13.04% | -6.89% | 12.58% |
IEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.62% | 13.71% | 5.70% | 10.54% | -18.35% | -2.28% | 5.57% | 16.06% | -5.53% | 9.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLI.L and IEMB.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | 0.56 |
The correlation between EMLI.L and IEMB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLI.L vs. IEMB.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMLI.L
IEMB.L
EMLI.L vs. IEMB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMLI.L | IEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 2.58 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 10.73 | -5.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMLI.L | IEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.88 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.21 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.36 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.51 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
EMLI.L vs. IEMB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLI.L drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum IEMB.L drawdown of -32.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLI.L and IEMB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLI.L | IEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -32.08% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -4.32% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.82% | -7.54% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.52% | -28.62% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.08% | -28.62% | +7.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -0.11% | -2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -5.02% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.04% | +0.55% |
Volatility
EMLI.L vs. IEMB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) is 2.02%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that EMLI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLI.L | IEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 2.57% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | 4.93% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.49% | 5.95% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.89% | 8.87% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 9.25% | +0.34% |
EMLI.L vs. IEMB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLI.L has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMLI.L vs. IEMB.L - Dividend Comparison
EMLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than IEMB.L's 5.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLI.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 6.55% | 5.81% | 6.33% | 5.70% | 5.21% | 4.50% | 3.68% | 5.24% | 5.83% | 5.76% | 6.69% | 7.09% |
IEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.83% | 5.85% | 5.80% | 5.65% | 5.55% | 3.95% | 3.86% | 4.73% | 4.82% | 4.79% | 5.57% | 4.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLI.L and IEMB.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEMB.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEMB.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMLI.L.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EMLI.L and 0.45% for IEMB.L.
Find the right allocation for EMLI.L and IEMB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer