PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMKIX vs. SHCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMKIX vs. SHCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt (SHCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EMKIX having a 2.85% return and SHCDX slightly lower at 2.83%. Over the past 10 years, EMKIX has underperformed SHCDX with an annualized return of 1.05%, while SHCDX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.68% annualized return.


EMKIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.68%
YTD
2.85%
6M
4.48%
1Y
14.11%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
-1.22%
10Y*
1.05%

SHCDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
2.83%
6M
3.47%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
4.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKIX vs. SHCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
2.85%18.51%1.06%11.08%-22.93%-11.27%2.19%9.73%-5.31%10.29%
SHCDX
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt
2.83%8.81%7.58%9.70%-11.76%1.95%7.77%13.94%-3.90%9.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKIX and SHCDX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.59

The correlation between EMKIX and SHCDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMKIX vs. SHCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMKIX
EMKIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EMKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SHCDX
SHCDX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SHCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SHCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKIX vs. SHCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt (SHCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMKIXSHCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

2.38

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

5.04

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

20.46

-9.63

EMKIX vs. SHCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is lower than the SHCDX Sharpe Ratio of 4.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMKIX and SHCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMKIXSHCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

4.69

-2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.83

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.95

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

1.09

-1.19

Drawdowns

EMKIX vs. SHCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKIX drawdown since its inception was -47.14%, which is greater than SHCDX's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKIX and SHCDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMKIXSHCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.14%

-26.24%

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.01%

-1.90%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.53%

-3.86%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.22%

-21.81%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-26.24%

-13.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.64%

0.00%

-17.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.07%

-3.12%

-17.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

0.47%

+0.86%

Volatility

EMKIX vs. SHCDX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt (SHCDX) at 0.72%. This indicates that EMKIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMKIXSHCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

0.72%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.23%

1.68%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.14%

2.04%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.56%

3.86%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

4.95%

+3.25%

EMKIX vs. SHCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMKIX and SHCDX have an expense ratio of 1.02%.


Dividends

EMKIX vs. SHCDX - Dividend Comparison

EMKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than SHCDX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
7.24%6.42%5.17%5.18%3.78%3.99%4.23%5.45%4.89%4.58%0.00%0.00%
SHCDX
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt
6.09%6.00%6.33%5.72%5.52%4.65%5.28%4.72%6.08%4.10%5.44%5.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMKIX and SHCDX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMKIX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to SHCDX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMKIX dropped -47.14% vs SHCDX's -26.24%.

SHCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.69 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMKIX and SHCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer