PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.DE) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIG.DE achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than UIQ4.DE's 3.01% return.


EMIG.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
0.97%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.73%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
2.05%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*

UIQ4.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
1.44%
YTD
3.01%
6M
3.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMIG.DE and UIQ4.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIG.DE
EMIG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EMIG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

UIQ4.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.DE) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMIG.DEUIQ4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMIG.DEUIQ4.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

1.27

-1.23

Drawdowns

EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIG.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, which is greater than UIQ4.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIG.DE and UIQ4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMIG.DEUIQ4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.46%

-3.90%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.38%

-0.25%

-13.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-0.87%

-7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.99%

Volatility

EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMIG.DEUIQ4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.95%

7.67%

+14.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

7.67%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.21%

7.67%

+4.54%

EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMIG.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than UIQ4.DE's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMIG.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMIG.DE nor UIQ4.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMIG.DE and UIQ4.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UIQ4.DE is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIQ4.DE is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMIG.DE.

EMIG.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while UIQ4.DE is Derivative Income. EMIG.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while UIQ4.DE tracks Euro Equity Defensive Put Write Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMIG.DE and 0.21% for UIQ4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMIG.DE and UIQ4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer