EMID.L vs. UD03.L
EMID.L (iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF) and UD03.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both Europe Equities funds - EMID.L tracks the MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR while UD03.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMID.L returned 7.51%/yr vs 10.65%/yr for UD03.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMID.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for UD03.L.
Performance
EMID.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMID.L is traded in EUR, while UD03.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UD03.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMID.L achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 13.28% return.
EMID.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 15.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- —
UD03.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 13.28%
- 6M
- 16.24%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- —
EMID.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMID.L iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF | 7.96% | 22.78% | 9.31% | 14.05% | -18.34% | 21.37% | 4.10% | -0.66% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 13.28% | 18.94% | 5.44% | 19.64% | -6.99% | 19.59% | -3.56% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMID.L and UD03.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, EMID.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
EMID.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMID.L
UD03.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Technology
Industrials
EMID.L
UD03.L
Financial Services
EMID.L
UD03.L
Healthcare
EMID.L
UD03.L
Consumer Defensive
EMID.L
UD03.L
Consumer Cyclical
EMID.L
UD03.L
Communication Services
EMID.L
UD03.L
Basic Materials
EMID.L
UD03.L
Utilities
EMID.L
UD03.L
Real Estate
EMID.L
UD03.L
-
Energy
EMID.L
UD03.L
Technology
EMID.L
UD03.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMID.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMID.L
UD03.L
EMID.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMID.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.52 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 5.56 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 16.13 | -9.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMID.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.96 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 1.63 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.02 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
EMID.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMID.L drawdown since its inception was -37.57%, roughly equal to the maximum UD03.L drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMID.L and UD03.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMID.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.57% | -36.77% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.39% | -8.71% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.04% | -13.75% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -19.79% | -9.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -1.09% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -3.54% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 3.39% | -1.14% |
Volatility
EMID.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.62%. This indicates that EMID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMID.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 3.62% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 16.41% | -4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 29.22% | -14.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 51.35% | -35.07% |
EMID.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMID.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMID.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison
EMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than UD03.L's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMID.L iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF | 2.57% | 2.78% | 2.75% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 1.78% | 1.39% | 2.33% | 2.84% | 0.48% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.54% | 2.97% | 2.84% | 3.67% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMID.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMID.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMID.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.
EMID.L tracks MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMID.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.
Find the right allocation for EMID.L and UD03.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer